Information about the new HSK (3.0)
In April 2021 was published the program of the new HSK, which will be effective 3 to 5 years later. Download link (the file is heavy, 51 MB): New HSK (2021) program
But in December 2025, a new version of the HSK program was published. Here is the direct link to the PDF: HSK 3.0 Program (12/2025 version).
The current HSK tests remain the standard until the end of June 2026.
The new HSK tests (3.0 from 12/2025) will be implemented starting from July 2026.
WARNING
There are very significant differences between the two programs.
Below are the tables of the two versions of the new HSK and the "current" HSK:
New HSK 3.0 (11/2025) program
| Levels | Characters reading |
Characters writing |
Words | Grammar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced | 7→9 | 3088 (+1148) | 1200 (+500) | 11000 (+5700) | 585 (+134) |
| Intermediate | 6 | 1940 (+413) | 700 (+150) | 5400 (+1800) | 451 (+50) |
| 5 | 1527 (+431) | 550 (+150) | 3600 (+ 1600) | 401 (+70) | |
| 4 | 1096 (+441) | 400 (+150) | 2000 (+1000) | 331 (+94) | |
| Beginner | 3 | 655 (+284) | 250 (+150) | 1000 (+500) | 237 (+96) |
| 2 | 371 (+125) | 100 | 500 (+200) | 141 (+75) | |
| 1 | 246 | 300 | 66 | ||
| Total | 3088 | 1200 | 11000 | 585 | |
HSK 3.0 (2021) program
| Levels | Syllables | Characters reading |
Characters writing |
Words | Grammar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced | 7→9 | 202 / 1110 | 1200 / 3000 | 500 / 1200 | 5636 / 11092 | 148 / 572 |
| Intermediate | 6 | 86 / 908 | 300 / 1800 | 400 / 700 | 1140 / 5456 | 67 / 424 |
| 5 | 98 / 822 | 300 / 1500 | 1071 / 4316 | 71 / 357 | ||
| 4 | 116 / 724 | 300 / 1200 | 1000 / 3245 | 76 / 286 | ||
| Beginner | 3 | 140 / 608 | 300 / 900 | 300 | 973 / 2245 | 81 / 210 |
| 2 | 199 / 468 | 300 / 600 | 772 / 1272 | 81 / 129 | ||
| 1 | 269 | 300 | 500 | 48 | ||
| Total | 1110 | 3000 | 1200 | 11092 | 572 | |
"Current" HSK (v 2.0) program
| Levels | Syllabus words | Actual words | Characters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 2500 (+1300) | 3018 | 1830 |
| 4 | 1200 (+600) | 1475 | 1096 |
| 3 | 600 (+300) | 760 | 625 |
| 2 | 300 (+150) | 420 | 358 |
| 1 | 150 | 211 | 187 |
We notice that the new version (12/2025) of the HSK 3.0 is ultimately closer to the current version of the HSK than to the first version (2021) of the new HSK (3.0).
A few remarks:
- The "Syllables" section has disappeared. This is good news because this section made little sense (see our previous analysis below).
- Level 2 is strangely shorter than Level 1, both in terms of words (200 additional words compared to 300 for Level 1) and characters (125 additional characters compared to 246 for Level 1).
- The progression is much less linear than in the 2021 version of the HSK 3.0.
- The reuse of characters to form new words is also less pronounced than in the 2021 version of the HSK 3.0.
The structure of the tests for the new HSK (3.0 of 12/2025)
Remarque : La durée totale de l’examen inclut le temps nécessaire au candidat pour remplir les informations personnelles ainsi que la feuille de réponses.
| Compétence | Partie |
Nombre de questions | Modèle de questions | Total (questions) | Durée (minutes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Écoute (C.O.) | 1 | 5 |
Type : QCM Question : un mot prononcé Réponses : 3 réponses au choix sous forme d'images |
20 | Environ 12 |
| 2 | 5 |
Type : QCM Question : : une phrase prononcée Réponses : 3 réponses au choix en caractères + pinyin |
|||
| 3 | 5 |
Type : Appariement Question : 5 mini dialogues de deux répliques Réponses : 5 réponses sous forme d'images à associer au bon dialogue |
|||
| 4 | 5 |
Type : QCM Question : Un phrase prononcée + une question sur cette phrase Réponses : 3 réponses au choix en caractères + pinyin |
|||
| Lecture (C.E.) | 1 | 5 |
Type : Appariement Question : 5 phrases en caractères + pinyin Réponses : 5 réponses sous forme d'images à associer à la bonne phrase |
20 | 20 |
| 2 | 5 |
Type : Appariement Question :10 phrases à associer pour former 5 couples. |
|||
| 3 | 5 |
Type : Texte à trous Question : 5 phrases ( caractères + pinyin) avec un mot manquant. Choisir le bon mot dans une liste de 5 ( caractères + pinyin) |
|||
| 4 | 5 |
Type : QCM Question : Une phrase en caractères + pinyin et une question sur cette phrase (caractères + pinyin) Réponses : 3 réponses au choix sous forme de mot en caractères + pinyin |
|||
| Total | 40 | 40 | Environ 40 | ||
| Compétence | Partie | Nombre de questions | Modèle de questions | Total (questions) | Durée (minutes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compréhension orale (Écoute) | 1 | 5 |
Type : QCM Question : Une phrase prononcée Réponses : 3 réponses au choix sous forme d'images |
25 | Environ 17 |
| 2 | 10 |
Type : Appariement Question : 5 mini dialogues de deux répliques Réponses : 5 réponses sous forme d'images à associer au bon dialogue |
|||
| 3 | 10 |
Type : QCM Question : Un mini dialogue de deux répiques + une question sur cette phrase Réponses : 3 réponses au choix en caractères + pinyin |
|||
| Compréhension écrite (Lecture) | 1 | 5 |
Type : Appariement Question : 5 phrases en caractères + pinyin Réponses : 5 réponses sous forme d'images à associer à la bonne phrase |
25 | 25 |
| 2 | 5 |
Type : Texte à trous Question : 5 phrases ( caractères + pinyin) avec un mot manquant. Choisir le bon mot dans une liste de 5 ( caractères + pinyin) |
|||
| 3 | 10 |
Type : Appariement Question :10 phrases à associer pour former 5 couples. |
|||
| 4 | 5 |
Type : QCM Question : Une phrase en caractères + pinyin et une question sur cette phrase (caractères + pinyin) Réponses : 3 réponses au choix sous forme de mot en caractères + pinyin |
|||
| Expression écrite | 1 | 5 |
Type : Appariement Question : Un caractère dans un mot avec un composant manquant Réponses : 5 composants au choix |
10 | 10 |
| 2 | 5 |
Type : Écriture Question : Une phrase avec un caractère manquant (le pinyin de la phrase est donné) Réponses : Écrire le caractère |
|||
| Total | 60 | 60 | Environ 60 | ||
| Compétence | Partie | Nombre de questions | Modèle de questions | Total (questions) | Durée (minutes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compréhension orale (Écoute) | 1 | 10 |
Type : Appariement Question : Dialogue très court (2 répliques) Réponses : Choisir l’image correspondant à ce que l’on entend |
30 | ≈ 23 |
| 2 | 10 |
Type : QCM Question : Dialogue court (5 de deux répliques puis 5 de 4 répliques) + 1 question finale Réponses : 3 réponses au choix en caractères |
|||
| 3 | 10 |
Type :QCM Support : Texte oral court + une question sur ce texte Réponses : 3 réponses au choix en caractères |
|||
| Compréhension écrite (Lecture) | 1 | 10 |
Type : Appariement Question : 10 phrases à associer pour former 5 couples. |
30 | 30 |
| 2 | 10 |
Type : Texte à trou Support : Phrase avec un mot manquant Réponses : mot en caractère à choisir |
|||
| 3 | 10 |
Type : QCM Question : Un texte en caractèreset une question en caractère sur ce texte Réponses : 3 réponses au choix sous forme de mot en caractères |
|||
| Expression écrite | 1 | 5 |
Type : Écriture Question : Une phrase avec un caractère manquant Réponses : Écrire le caractère |
10 | 20 |
| 2 | 5 |
Type : Rédaction Support : Image + mot-clé Consigne : Rédiger une phrase complète Réponses : Phrase libre |
|||
| Total | 70 | 70 | ≈ 83 | ||
Pour les modèles de test de niveau suppérieur, je vous invite à consulter directement les exemples de test
Our previous analysis of HSK 3.0 (version 2021)
First, let's take a little step back to see previous versions of HSK.
HSK 1.0 became effective in 1990, after 6 years of research and experimentation. HSK 1.0 was divided into three parts and 11 levels in 1997. This was the first level exam of Chinese issued by mainland China for non-natives. More than 26,000 people took this test. 46 examination sites were active in 29 different countries.
HSK 2.0 is the current HSK. It became effective in 2009. It is based on 6 levels. Each level has specific vocabulary content. However, it should be noted that this content was not really respected for the reasons we will see later. From level 1 to 3, a content of grammar points was also specified. These 6 levels were put in parallel with those of the CEFR. But this parallel has often been criticized given the low content of level 1. Indeed, the main modification of HSK 2.0 is the simplification of the first levels. The goal was clearly stated: to encourage the learning of Chinese.
HSK 3.0. The program will be officially effective on July 1, 2021, but the tests for the first 6 levels will not be in place for 3 to 5 years. For the level 7 to 9 common test, for which there is no equivalent in the current HSK, a first exam will take place in December 2021 to "experience" the novelty. It should then be officially put in place in March 2022.
HSK 3.0 will be divided into 3 main parts and 9 levels:
Part 1
(Beginner 初等水平) level 1, 2 and 3.
Part 2 (Intermediate 中等水平) : level 4, 5 and 6.
Part 3 Advanced 高等水平): level 7, 8 and 9.
Levels 7 to 9 have a common program. There will be an unique exam and the level will be awarded based on the test results.
The 6 levels (+ part 3) have a very precise program in terms of syllables, characters, words and grammar point.
And this is the great and really interesting novelty of HSK 3.0: the program is not only based on vocabulary words lists but also on characters lists.
Before going any further, it should be noted that in Chinese, "word" and "character" are two very different things. A character can be one (or even more) word and a word can be composed of one, two, three or even four characters. Some characters have a meaning, for example国 guó "country", but are not used in isolation. The WORD "country" is 国家 guójiā in 2 characters. Each of these two characters are reused in a large number of words. Example: 中国 , 法国 , 外国 , 国外 / 家人 , 搬家 , 家里 人, etc.
It is a big mistake to confuse character and word in Chinese.
The big problem with HSK 1.0 and 2.0 is that the content is vocabulary-based, not character-based. However, as we have just said, the reuse of characters from the same level makes it possible to construct a much larger number of vocabulary words than that presented in the level concerned. These words are also found in the annals of HSK 2.0 even though they are not present in the vocabulary list of the program. It is for this reason that in the courses of this site we have more vocabulary words per level than those announced in the program. I called these words “variants.” For example, for HSK 2.0 level 1, the official list has 150 vocabulary words, whereas I have counted 211 in the annals, and this number can easily be increased even further. I only stuck to the variants of the annals.
One of the big changes of HSK 3.0 is that it incorporates character lists and this notion of reusing characters to form words. Vocabulary learning is optimized.
I welcome this because it is a principle that I was already using in the courses on Learn-chinese.online, hence the higher number of vocabulary words than in the HSK program.
We can notice the column “Syllables”. This is the part of the program that makes the least sense to me. A “phonetics and phonology” part would have been very interesting, but I don't see what use can be made of giving a list of syllables. From an educational point of view, this is nonsense.
Then come the characters, words and grammar column with the additional number per level / total.
There was already a grammar program in HSK 2.0 up to level 3. It is much more detailed in HSK 3.0.
The main novelty is, as we saw above, the list of characters.
Another great innovation is the integration of skills by level with sometimes quite precise benchmarks.
This is some examples from level 1:
Listening: be able to understand a dialogue up to 80 characters at a rate
of 100 syllables per minute minimum. Pictures or objects can help understanding.
Speaking: knowing how to use vocabulary and grammar points to express
yourself simply.
Reading: be able to read a text of 100 characters maximum
with a reading rate of 80 characters per minute minimum. Pictures or objects can help
understanding.
Writting: be able to write 100 characters of the level (out
of the 300) respecting the order and direction of writing as well as elementary punctuation,
with a minimum speed of 10 characters per minute. Be able to write simple words or sentences on
basic personal information.
Notice the difference in the amount of characters for reading (300) and for writing (100). This is inspired by Joël Bellassen's character threshold lists. It is pedagogically very interesting because we always know more characters in reading than in writing. The characters to know in writing are not presented by level (1 to 9), but by part (beginner, intermediate and advanced).